The meeting

Avigdor Arikha, autoportrait

Avigdor Arikha, self-portrait

“I met Eugene Istomin for the first time in March 1965, at the castle if Baroness Alix de Rothshild, whom was then my sponsor. She chaired Youth Aliya, an association which helped the immigration of young Jews in Israel. Eugene had agreed to give a benefit concert for the association. We later met at her home, at the Châteaux de Reux in Normandy. Ever since that day, Eugene and I were very close friends, until he passed away.

From our first meeting, he wanted to know my life story, which affected him immensely. When I was twelve years old, in 1941, I was deported with my family to a concentration camp in Ukraine, where we worked in a foundry which made ammunitions for the German army. There were about twenty Ukrainians and eight hundred prisoners. I had begun to draw at the age of nine, and had continued in the camp, as much as I could. A prisoner had gathered around thirty of my drawings in a makeshift binding, which I hid. One day, a guard found it. At first furious, he flipped through the drawings and became kinder. He said: ‘My child, you are playing with fire!’. He destroyed thirteen of the drawings, those who depicted the atrocities of the camp in a too explicit way. He kept the others and promised to show them to the Red Cross Committee due to visit a few days later. On March 6, 1943, a Friday, I was released with my sister and sent to Palestine with a small group of children. In 1948, I participated in the Israel War for Independence and was injured. The year after, I came to Paris to study at the Ecole des Beaux-Arts. I also attended philosophy classes at la Sorbonne. I was 20 years old.

Nineteen sixty-five, the year I met Eugene, was a crucial year for me. I had decided to turn my back on abstract art just as I began to enjoy success. I now wanted to draw and paint only from life. It was not a rejection of abstraction, but an irresistible call to something that I felt was essential.”

The art of Avigdor Arikha

Later self-portrait

In Arikha’s obituary he wrote for The Independent, Marco Livingstone summarized his evolution and philosophy: “Arika was unapologetically sure of the path he had taken after first making his name as painter of refined, sensuous and intellectually rigorous abstractions… He was truculently insistent that he was not part of any ‘return to figuration’, but rather had found his own way as ‘a post-abstract representational artist’.” A few years earlier, Livingstone had reported Arikha’s demand for immediacy and truth: “He insists on saying that only what can be seen is true, and that it should be painted alla prima or drawn in a single session. He tells us that we can only trust the place and the moment. The past, in his opinion, is subject to all sorts of re-interpretations, and the future is just a matter of speculation.”

It meant that painting or drawing was an art of the moment, as dancing or playing the piano. Such a quest, which went against the flow of fashion, could only seduce Eugene Istomin, himself seeking an unreachable aim. Istomin was also very impressed by the erudition of Arikha, who was a globally acknowledged expert of Poussin and Ingres, and by his considerable knowledge of all periods of art history.

A long-lasting friendship

Eugene Istomin, dessin d’Arikha

Eugene Istomin, Arikha’s drawing

The first exhibition of Arikha in the United States took place in 1972 at the Marlborough Gallery, and was followed by many others. Arikha came frequently to give conferences at universities or major American museums. Whenever possible, Arikha stayed at Istomin’s, and they spent entire nights speaking, playing or listening to music, eating, and drinking a lot. For his part, Istomin visited Arikha whenever he performed in France or stopped off at Paris, and Samuel Beckett often joined them.

According to Marco Livingstone, an evening with Arikha could be very rich, “with topic ranging from Michelangelo to modern literature, to the frontiers of science and technology. Given his sometimes forbidding seriousness and the strictness of his opinions, which included a loathing of contemporary popular culture, his laughter always came as a welcome and joyous surprise. He was a human being of rare integrity, guided by his formidable intellect and his passions, and an artist of consummate grace who breathed life on to the surface of every canvas and every sheet of paper he touched.” Many of these personality traits could also be applied to his friend Istomin! Their friendship was built on mutual respect as artists and as human beings. What struck Arikha most was Istomin’s generosity, his attention to others, whoever they were, and his sense of self-mockery. Their discussions could be very passionate, almost tense sometimes.

Fond memories told by Arikha

Arikha 2

Poster signed Arikha

“I would accompany Eugene from time to time to galleries or dealers. I advised him for some purchases: a drawing by Matisse, a painting by Soutine, a pencil drawing by Juan Gris, another by Fernand Léger (Musical Instruments!). But most often he would decide for himself. For a non-professional, he had a good eye. Sometimes he got excited and went into inconsiderate spending! I remember seeing Eugene arrive one day in full effervescence: he had found, on Quai Saint-Michel, an extraordinary lithograph of Ibsen in the Café of the Grand Hotel in Oslo. It was a print on Japan paper, whose price was undoubtedly excessive, but he was so enthusiastic that he did not even think of it.”

“One evening, Anne, my wife, cried while reading her poems. Eugene made a friendly reproach: ‘ It’s up to the audience to cry, not to the artist!’ He himself respected this rule when he was playing the piano. The emotion had to come from the music, not from faces of the pianist. ”

“Eugene wanted to publish a book about me at HBJ. He secretly prepared it and asked Samuel Beckett, who was an old friend of mine and had become his, to write a text. But due to HBJ’s financial difficulties, the project was not completed.”

“I have many wonderful musical memories of him, alone or with Stern and Rose. I had the feeling that he was the soul and essence of the trio, its musical conscience. Today, if I had to mention only one, it would be the last time I heard him. It was in Evian, in 1997, Mozart’s Concerto No. 21 with the Franz Liszt Chamber Orchestra. I was sitting next to Jean-Pierre Rampal who was also moved to tears.”

Interview with Bernard Meillat (2006)

Istomin often served as a model for Arikha. He had a collection of thirty-nine drawings, some purchased, some donated (partly bought, partly given). Among them, several portraits of himself, his mother, Marta, Jean-Bernard Pommier, Samuel Beckett, Anne Arikha, and several self-portraits.

Music

Mozart. Concerto No. 21 in C major K. 467, second movement. Eugene Istomin, Nouvel Orchestre Philharmonique de l’ORTF. Emmanuel Krivine. June 29, 1977.